head-to-head
OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-13.
| OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro | Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | openai | qwen |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $0.10/M | $0.15/M |
| Output Price | $0.50/M | $0.47/M |
| Context Window | 1,050,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Max Output | 128,000 | 131,072 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | ✓ |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, GPT-6 Luna Pro costs $0.23 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash costs $0.27, so GPT-6 Luna Pro is slightly cheaper for the same work.
Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,050,000 and 1,000,000 tokens, about 1,575 and 1,500 pages.
Only Qwen3.8 Omni Flash offers audio input and video input.
Pick GPT-6 Luna Pro if you need lower cost; pick Qwen3.8 Omni Flash if you need audio input or video input.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Related comparisons
Meta: Muse Wonder vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro
Meta: Muse Wonder vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
StepFun: Step 5 Preview vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro
StepFun: Step 5 Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash