value rankings

Intelligence Per Dollar

Benchmark points per blended dollar across every credibly ranked model. Scores are min-max normalized across 233 models with 4+ independent benchmarks; cost assumes a typical 3:1 input:output token mix. Leader = 100.

This is not a quality ranking. #1 here means the most benchmark points per dollar, so a mid-scoring budget model will outrank a frontier model that costs 100x more. Check the Score and % of top score columns for raw capability, and use the task rankings when output quality is what compounds in your workflow.

Value leaderboard

#ModelScore% of top scoreIn / Out per 1MBlended $/1MValue
1Ling-3.0-flash BEST VALUEinclusionai/ling-3.0-flash64.464%$0.02 / $0.06$0.03100.0
2inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flashinclusionai/ling-2.6-flash21.622%$0.01 / $0.03$0.0170.4
3Upstage: Solar Pro 4upstage/solar-pro470.270%$0.03 / $0.12$0.0565.4
4OpenAI: gpt-oss-120bopenai/gpt-oss-120b43.143%$0.03 / $0.17$0.0732.4
5Mistral: Mistral Small 3mistralai/mistral-small-24b-instruct-250128.829%$0.05 / $0.08$0.0624.5
6OpenAI: gpt-oss-20bopenai/gpt-oss-20b25.726%$0.03 / $0.13$0.0622.9
7OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano (batch)openai/gpt-5-nano:batch32.132%$0.03 / $0.20$0.0722.8
8Mistral: Mistral Small 3.2 24Bmistralai/mistral-small-3.2-24b-instruct59.660%$0.09 / $0.25$0.1321.9
9OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Lunaopenai/gpt-5.6-luna88.288%$0.10 / $0.60$0.2319.2
10OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)openai/gpt-5.6-luna:batch88.288%$0.10 / $0.60$0.2319.2
11Google: Gemma 4 31Bgoogle/gemma-4-31b-it56.757%$0.10 / $0.34$0.1617.3
12Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flashz-ai/glm-4.7-flash46.747%$0.06 / $0.40$0.1515.8
13OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano (batch)openai/gpt-5.4-nano:batch68.669%$0.10 / $0.62$0.2314.5
14MiniMax: MiniMax M3 (batch)minimax/minimax-m3:batch77.077%$0.15 / $0.60$0.2614.3
15StepFun: Step 3.5 Flashstepfun/step-3.5-flash42.943%$0.10 / $0.30$0.1514.0
16inclusionAI: Ring-2.6-1Tinclusionai/ring-2.6-1t58.859%$0.07 / $0.62$0.2113.5
17Qwen: Qwen3.5-9Bqwen/qwen3.5-9b30.831%$0.10 / $0.15$0.1113.4
18Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it51.752%$0.12 / $0.40$0.1913.3
19Qwen: Qwen3 32Bqwen/qwen3-32b35.035%$0.08 / $0.28$0.1313.2
20NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightningnvidia/nemotron-3.5-lightning34.635%$0.10 / $0.25$0.1412.3
21NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Supernvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b39.039%$0.09 / $0.40$0.1611.6
22OpenAI: GPT-5 Nanoopenai/gpt-5-nano32.132%$0.05 / $0.40$0.1411.4
23Google: Gemma 3 4Bgoogle/gemma-3-4b-it14.514%$0.05 / $0.10$0.0611.3
24inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-1Tinclusionai/ling-2.6-1t42.943%$0.07 / $0.62$0.219.9
25DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3deepseek/deepseek-chat86.386%$0.26 / $1.03$0.459.4
26Nex AGI: Nex-N2-Pronex-agi/nex-n2-pro81.181%$0.25 / $1.00$0.449.1
27OpenAI: GPT-4.1 Nano (batch)openai/gpt-4.1-nano:batch15.415%$0.05 / $0.20$0.098.6
28Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instructqwen/qwen3-coder-30b-a3b-instruct21.221%$0.07 / $0.28$0.128.5
29IBM: Granite 4.1 8Bibm-granite/granite-4.1-8b10.310%$0.05 / $0.10$0.068.1
30OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nanoopenai/gpt-5.4-nano68.669%$0.20 / $1.25$0.467.3

Budget champions : 80+ score, cheapest first

#ModelScore% of top scoreIn / Out per 1MBlended $/1MValue
1OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Lunaopenai/gpt-5.6-luna88.288%$0.10 / $0.60$0.2319.2
2OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)openai/gpt-5.6-luna:batch88.288%$0.10 / $0.60$0.2319.2
3Nex AGI: Nex-N2-Pronex-agi/nex-n2-pro81.181%$0.25 / $1.00$0.449.1
4DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3deepseek/deepseek-chat86.386%$0.26 / $1.03$0.459.4
5OpenAI: o4 Mini High (batch)openai/o4-mini-high:batch81.081%$0.55 / $2.20$0.964.1
6Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch)z-ai/glm-5.2:batch89.389%$0.70 / $2.20$1.074.1
7Z.ai: GLM 5.2z-ai/glm-5.289.389%$0.50 / $3.15$1.163.8
8DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Prodeepseek/deepseek-v4-pro90.590%$1.17 / $2.34$1.463.0
9Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)google/gemini-3.6-flash:batch84.484%$0.75 / $3.75$1.502.8
10Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)google/gemini-3.5-flash:batch84.384%$0.75 / $4.50$1.692.4

Free models with credible scores

Per-dollar math breaks at $0. These are simply the strongest free options:

Assumptions

Value = blended benchmark score divided by blended price per million tokens, indexed to the leader. A 3:1 input:output ratio fits most chat and RAG workloads; estimate your exact mix with the cost calculator. Scoring details in the methodology. Models with fewer than 4 independent benchmarks are excluded rather than guessed.