head-to-head
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs OpenAI: GPT Luna Latest
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-13.
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | OpenAI: GPT Luna Latest | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | qwen | ~openai |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $0.15/M | $0.10/M |
| Output Price | $0.47/M | $0.50/M |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 | 1,050,000 |
| Max Output | 131,072 | 128,000 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | ✓ | - |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, GPT Luna Latest costs $0.23 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash costs $0.27, so GPT Luna Latest is slightly cheaper for the same work.
Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,000,000 and 1,050,000 tokens, about 1,500 and 1,575 pages.
Only Qwen3.8 Omni Flash offers audio input and video input.
Pick Qwen3.8 Omni Flash if you need audio input or video input; pick GPT Luna Latest if you need lower cost.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Related comparisons
Meta: Muse Wonder vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Meta: Muse Wonder vs OpenAI: GPT Luna Latest
StepFun: Step 5 Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
StepFun: Step 5 Preview vs OpenAI: GPT Luna Latest
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs OpenAI: GPT Luna Latest
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT Luna Latest