Code · best for
Best AI model for CI/CD Pipelines (2026)
Authoring GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and CircleCI configs. Ranked from 346 live models on the OpenRouter catalog, weighted for reasoning quality, structured output, context window.
| # | Model | Score | In / 1M | Out / 1M | Context | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plusqwen/qwen3.6-plus | 120 | $0.33 | $1.95 | 1,000,000 | Try → |
| 2 | xAI: Grok 4.20x-ai/grok-4.20 | 120 | $2.00 | $6.00 | 2,000,000 | Try → |
| 3 | OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nanoopenai/gpt-5.4-nano | 120 | $0.20 | $1.25 | 400,000 | Try → |
| 4 | OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Miniopenai/gpt-5.4-mini | 120 | $0.75 | $4.50 | 400,000 | Try → |
| 5 | OpenAI: GPT-5.4openai/gpt-5.4 | 120 | $2.50 | $15.00 | 1,050,000 | Try → |
| 6 | Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Previewgoogle/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview | 120 | $0.25 | $1.50 | 1,048,576 | Try → |
| 7 | Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flashqwen/qwen3.5-flash-02-23 | 120 | $0.07 | $0.26 | 1,000,000 | Try → |
| 8 | Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Toolsgoogle/gemini-3.1-pro-preview-customtools | 120 | $2.00 | $12.00 | 1,048,576 | Try → |
| 9 | OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codexopenai/gpt-5.3-codex | 120 | $1.75 | $14.00 | 400,000 | Try → |
| 10 | Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Previewgoogle/gemini-3.1-pro-preview | 120 | $2.00 | $12.00 | 1,048,576 | Try → |
| 11 | Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15qwen/qwen3.5-plus-02-15 | 120 | $0.26 | $1.56 | 1,000,000 | Try → |
| 12 | Google: Gemini 3 Flash Previewgoogle/gemini-3-flash-preview | 120 | $0.50 | $3.00 | 1,048,576 | Try → |
| 13 | OpenAI: GPT-5.2openai/gpt-5.2 | 120 | $1.75 | $14.00 | 400,000 | Try → |
| 14 | xAI: Grok 4.1 Fastx-ai/grok-4.1-fast | 120 | $0.20 | $0.50 | 2,000,000 | Try → |
| 15 | OpenAI: GPT-5.1openai/gpt-5.1 | 120 | $1.25 | $10.00 | 400,000 | Try → |
How we ranked these
For CI/CD Pipelines, we weight models on reasoning quality, structured output, context window. Higher means better. Scores combine OpenRouter's model metadata (context length, modality support, tool calling, structured output, reasoning capability) with public pricing. See full methodology →
Related tasks
Code
Best for SQL Generation
Writing correct, performant SQL from natural-language prompts.
Code
Best for Code Review
Spotting bugs, security issues, and style problems in pull requests.
Code
Best for Code Completion
Inline IDE-style autocomplete that has to feel instant.
Code
Best for Code Refactoring
Safely restructuring an existing codebase across many files.
Code
Best for Bug Fixing
Diagnosing root cause and producing a working patch.
Code
Best for Unit Test Generation
Generating thorough test suites for existing functions.