picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-13.

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
Vendorgoogleanthropic
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score62.394.7
Input Price$0.30/M$2.50/M
Output Price$2.50/M$12.50/M
Context Window1,048,5761,000,000
Max Output65,536128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index61.894.6
ai_index_agentic44.881.5
ai_index_coding81.4100.0
eqbench-83.3

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
SQL Generation 161 178
Code Review 157 179
Code Completion 132 121
Code Refactoring 156 176
Bug Fixing 166 193
Unit Test Generation 146 161
Code Documentation 140 148
Regex Writing 131 138
CI/CD Pipelines 137 151
Frontend Component Design 139 151
Data Analysis 157 178
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 149 158
ETL Scripting 147 164
JSON Extraction 145 138
Bulk Data Labeling 133 123
OCR / Document Parsing 143 149
Table Extraction from PDFs 143 149
Long-Document Summarization 153 171
Short-Form Summarization 129 123
Blog Post Writing 135 146

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) Sakana: Sakana Namazu vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Sakana: Sakana Namazu vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)