picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-06-22.

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Vendorgoogleqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score84.554.1
Input Price$1.50/M$0.26/M
Output Price$9.00/M$2.08/M
Context Window1,048,576262,144
Max Output65,536262,144
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index82.853.3
ai_index_agentic61.834.2
ai_index_coding100.075.4

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.5 FlashQwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
SQL Generation 168 155
Code Review 164 148
Code Completion 119 129
Code Refactoring 162 145
Bug Fixing 176 156
Unit Test Generation 152 140
Code Documentation 141 133
Regex Writing 133 129
CI/CD Pipelines 143 132
Frontend Component Design 145 137
Data Analysis 167 152
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 153 142
ETL Scripting 152 139
JSON Extraction 138 143
Bulk Data Labeling 124 133
OCR / Document Parsing 146 139
Table Extraction from PDFs 146 139
Long-Document Summarization 157 143
Short-Form Summarization 121 128
Blog Post Writing 138 130

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B