head-to-head

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-13.

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)
Vendorinclusionaideepseek
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score38.666.3
Input Price$0.02/M$0.11/M
Output Price$0.06/M$0.34/M
Context Window262,1441,048,576
Max Output32,768131,072
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index40.565.1

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.036 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) costs $0.20, so Ling 3.0 Flash VL is about 5.4 times cheaper for the same work.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash VL.

Only Ling 3.0 Flash VL offers video input.

On our blended benchmark score DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) leads 66.3 to 38.6.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on 2 (JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) on 18 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).

Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL if you need lower cost or video input; pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) if you need long documents, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VLDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)
SQL Generation 136 141
Code Review 134 144
Code Completion 130 133
Code Refactoring 134 146
Bug Fixing 138 148
Unit Test Generation 126 131
Code Documentation 130 137
Regex Writing 124 126
CI/CD Pipelines 122 127
Frontend Component Design 126 129
Data Analysis 130 133
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 130 136
ETL Scripting 128 137
JSON Extraction 132 131
Bulk Data Labeling 130 129
OCR / Document Parsing 130 134
Table Extraction from PDFs 130 134
Long-Document Summarization 136 148
Short-Form Summarization 126 127
Blog Post Writing 124 129

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Meta: Muse Wonder vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Meta: Muse Wonder vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) StepFun: Step 5 Preview vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL StepFun: Step 5 Preview vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.