head-to-head

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-13.

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Vendorinclusionaiqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score38.677.3
Input Price$0.02/M$2.00/M
Output Price$0.06/M$6.00/M
Context Window262,1441,000,000
Max Output32,768131,072
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index40.574.9

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.036 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $3.50, so Ling 3.0 Flash VL is about 96.2 times cheaper for the same work.

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) reads up to 1,000,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,500 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash VL.

On our blended benchmark score Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads 77.3 to 38.6.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others), Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on 16 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).

Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL if you need lower cost; pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) if you need long documents, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VLQwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SQL Generation 136 142
Code Review 134 146
Code Completion 130 119
Code Refactoring 134 148
Bug Fixing 138 150
Unit Test Generation 126 133
Code Documentation 130 137
Regex Writing 124 125
CI/CD Pipelines 122 129
Frontend Component Design 126 131
Data Analysis 130 135
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 130 136
ETL Scripting 128 138
JSON Extraction 132 122
Bulk Data Labeling 130 119
OCR / Document Parsing 130 134
Table Extraction from PDFs 130 134
Long-Document Summarization 136 149
Short-Form Summarization 126 118
Blog Post Writing 124 130

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Meta: Muse Wonder vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Meta: Muse Wonder vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) StepFun: Step 5 Preview vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL StepFun: Step 5 Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.