Nex AGI: Nex-N2.5-Pro vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-13.
| Nex AGI: Nex-N2.5-Pro | Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | nex-agi | meta |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $0.07/M | $0.10/M |
| Output Price | $0.25/M | $0.20/M |
| Context Window | 262,144 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output | 235,929 | 943,718 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Nex-N2.5-Pro costs $0.14 and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor costs $0.15, so Nex-N2.5-Pro is slightly cheaper for the same work.
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Nex-N2.5-Pro.
Only Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor offers video input.
Across the 14 tasks where they differ, Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor on 14 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).
Pick Nex-N2.5-Pro if you need lower cost; pick Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor if you need long documents, video input or the stronger all-round task scores.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | Nex AGI: Nex-N2.5-Pro | Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 131 | 134 |
| Code Review | 126 | 132 |
| Code Completion | 129 | 131 |
| Code Refactoring | 127 | 136 |
| Bug Fixing | 130 | 136 |
| Unit Test Generation | 121 | 124 |
| Code Documentation | 126 | 131 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 117 | 120 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 128 | 134 |
| ETL Scripting | 122 | 128 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 128 | 131 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 128 | 131 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 129 | 138 |
| Blog Post Writing | 119 | 122 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →