head-to-head

OpenAI: GPT-6 Sol vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-13.

OpenAI: GPT-6 Sol inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Vendoropenaiinclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score81.438.6
Input Price$2.00/M$0.02/M
Output Price$10.00/M$0.06/M
Context Window1,050,000262,144
Max Output128,00032,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index78.640.5

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.036 and GPT-6 Sol costs $4.50, so Ling 3.0 Flash VL is about 123.6 times cheaper for the same work.

GPT-6 Sol reads up to 1,050,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,575 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash VL.

Only Ling 3.0 Flash VL offers video input.

On our blended benchmark score GPT-6 Sol leads 81.4 to 38.6.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, GPT-6 Sol scores higher on 16 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), Ling 3.0 Flash VL on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others).

Pick GPT-6 Sol if you need long documents, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL if you need lower cost or video input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskOpenAI: GPT-6 SolinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL
SQL Generation 142 136
Code Review 146 134
Code Completion 119 130
Code Refactoring 148 134
Bug Fixing 150 138
Unit Test Generation 133 126
Code Documentation 136 130
Regex Writing 125 124
CI/CD Pipelines 129 122
Frontend Component Design 131 126
Data Analysis 135 130
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 135 130
ETL Scripting 139 128
JSON Extraction 121 132
Bulk Data Labeling 118 130
OCR / Document Parsing 134 130
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 130
Long-Document Summarization 149 136
Short-Form Summarization 117 126
Blog Post Writing 130 124

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Meta: Muse Wonder vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Sol Meta: Muse Wonder vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL StepFun: Step 5 Preview vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Sol StepFun: Step 5 Preview vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Sol Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Sol Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.