OpenAI: GPT Terra Latest vs Nex AGI: Nex-N2.5-Pro
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-13.
| OpenAI: GPT Terra Latest | Nex AGI: Nex-N2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | ~openai | nex-agi |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $2.00/M | $0.07/M |
| Output Price | $12.00/M | $0.25/M |
| Context Window | 1,050,000 | 262,144 |
| Max Output | 128,000 | 235,929 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Nex-N2.5-Pro costs $0.14 and GPT Terra Latest costs $5.00, so Nex-N2.5-Pro is about 36.4 times cheaper for the same work.
GPT Terra Latest reads up to 1,050,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,575 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Nex-N2.5-Pro.
Across the 18 tasks where they differ, GPT Terra Latest scores higher on 13 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), Nex-N2.5-Pro on 5 (Code Completion, Regex Writing, JSON Extraction and others).
Pick GPT Terra Latest if you need long documents or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Nex-N2.5-Pro if you need lower cost.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | OpenAI: GPT Terra Latest | Nex AGI: Nex-N2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 132 | 131 |
| Code Review | 132 | 126 |
| Code Completion | 117 | 129 |
| Code Refactoring | 136 | 127 |
| Bug Fixing | 136 | 130 |
| Unit Test Generation | 124 | 121 |
| Code Documentation | 129 | 126 |
| Regex Writing | 117 | 119 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 120 | 117 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 132 | 128 |
| ETL Scripting | 128 | 122 |
| JSON Extraction | 121 | 131 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 117 | 129 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 131 | 128 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 131 | 128 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 136 | 129 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 113 | 123 |
| Blog Post Writing | 120 | 119 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →