head-to-head
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-13.
| Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash | StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | qwen | stepfun |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | - | 50.1 |
| Input Price | $0.03/M | $0.20/M |
| Output Price | $0.13/M | $1.15/M |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 | 262,144 |
| Max Output | 65,536 | 256,000 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | - | 51.0 |
| ai_index_agentic | - | 35.9 |
| ai_index_coding | - | 65.3 |
Who wins by task?
| Task | Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash | StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 134 | 153 |
| Code Review | 132 | 146 |
| Code Completion | 132 | 130 |
| Code Refactoring | 136 | 144 |
| Bug Fixing | 136 | 155 |
| Unit Test Generation | 124 | 139 |
| Code Documentation | 132 | 133 |
| Regex Writing | 120 | 129 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 120 | 131 |
| Frontend Component Design | 122 | 136 |
| Data Analysis | 124 | 150 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 134 | 141 |
| ETL Scripting | 128 | 138 |
| JSON Extraction | 132 | 142 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 130 | 133 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 131 | 138 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 131 | 138 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 138 | 142 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 124 | 128 |
| Blog Post Writing | 122 | 130 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash
ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash
ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash
SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
Sakana: Sakana Namazu vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash
Sakana: Sakana Namazu vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash