head-to-head
SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-13.
| SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 | Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | x-ai | |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 99.8 | 84.4 |
| Input Price | $2.00/M | $0.75/M |
| Output Price | $6.00/M | $3.75/M |
| Context Window | 500,000 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output | - | 65,536 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | ✓ |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 100.0 | 85.1 |
| ai_index_agentic | 96.8 | 66.8 |
| ai_index_coding | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Who wins by task?
| Task | SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 | Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 175 | 170 |
| Code Review | 171 | 165 |
| Code Completion | 120 | 132 |
| Code Refactoring | 167 | 163 |
| Bug Fixing | 187 | 178 |
| Unit Test Generation | 157 | 153 |
| Code Documentation | 144 | 142 |
| Regex Writing | 138 | 135 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 147 | 143 |
| Frontend Component Design | 149 | 145 |
| Data Analysis | 177 | 168 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 155 | 154 |
| ETL Scripting | 157 | 153 |
| JSON Extraction | 140 | 148 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 125 | 134 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 147 | 146 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 147 | 146 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 163 | 159 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 124 | 131 |
| Blog Post Writing | 143 | 139 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6
ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)
ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6
ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)
SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 vs Sakana: Sakana Namazu
SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2
SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max
SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Small