picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-13.

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)
Vendorqwengoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-84.4
Input Price$0.03/M$0.75/M
Output Price$0.13/M$3.75/M
Context Window1,000,0001,048,576
Max Output65,53665,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-85.1
ai_index_agentic-66.8
ai_index_coding-100.0

Who wins by task?

TaskQwen: Qwen3.7 FlashGoogle: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)
SQL Generation 134 170
Code Review 132 165
Code Completion 132 132
Code Refactoring 136 163
Bug Fixing 136 178
Unit Test Generation 124 153
Code Documentation 132 142
Regex Writing 120 135
CI/CD Pipelines 120 143
Frontend Component Design 122 145
Data Analysis 124 168
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 134 154
ETL Scripting 128 153
JSON Extraction 132 148
Bulk Data Labeling 130 134
OCR / Document Parsing 131 146
Table Extraction from PDFs 131 146
Long-Document Summarization 138 159
Short-Form Summarization 124 131
Blog Post Writing 122 139

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) Sakana: Sakana Namazu vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash Sakana: Sakana Namazu vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)