picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-06-22.

StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Google: Gemma 4 31B
Vendorstepfungoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score48.056.4
Input Price$0.20/M$0.12/M
Output Price$1.15/M$0.35/M
Context Window256,000262,144
Max Output256,000262,144
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index49.148.4
ai_index_agentic35.523.8
ai_index_coding61.671.7
eqbench-70.8

Who wins by task?

TaskStepFun: Step 3.7 FlashGoogle: Gemma 4 31B
SQL Generation 152 157
Code Review 145 154
Code Completion 129 132
Code Refactoring 143 152
Bug Fixing 154 161
Unit Test Generation 138 143
Code Documentation 132 138
Regex Writing 129 131
CI/CD Pipelines 131 136
Frontend Component Design 135 138
Data Analysis 149 152
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 140 146
ETL Scripting 137 144
JSON Extraction 142 143
Bulk Data Labeling 133 133
OCR / Document Parsing 137 140
Table Extraction from PDFs 137 140
Long-Document Summarization 141 150
Short-Form Summarization 128 129
Blog Post Writing 129 134

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Google: Gemma 4 31B Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Google: Gemma 4 31B MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs xAI: Grok Build 0.1 StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash