head-to-head
StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-06-22.
| StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash | OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | stepfun | openai |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 48.0 | 68.0 |
| Input Price | $0.20/M | $0.20/M |
| Output Price | $1.15/M | $1.25/M |
| Context Window | 256,000 | 400,000 |
| Max Output | 256,000 | 128,000 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 49.1 | 63.1 |
| ai_index_agentic | 35.5 | 45.4 |
| ai_index_coding | 61.6 | 92.5 |
Who wins by task?
| Task | StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash | OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 152 | 163 |
| Code Review | 145 | 158 |
| Code Completion | 129 | 133 |
| Code Refactoring | 143 | 157 |
| Bug Fixing | 154 | 168 |
| Unit Test Generation | 138 | 148 |
| Code Documentation | 132 | 140 |
| Regex Writing | 129 | 132 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 131 | 139 |
| Frontend Component Design | 135 | 141 |
| Data Analysis | 149 | 159 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 140 | 151 |
| ETL Scripting | 137 | 148 |
| JSON Extraction | 142 | 146 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 133 | 134 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 137 | 144 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 137 | 144 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 141 | 154 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 128 | 130 |
| Blog Post Writing | 129 | 135 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano
StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs xAI: Grok Build 0.1
StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash